Collaboration—have you built your strategy?

by Dan Stephens 1/16/2010 10:45:00 PM

Collaboration is the magic buzz word of the decade.  For those who have read my other articles,you should have a good understanding of some of the tools we can use, but Collaboration is not about the individual tools, it’s about the communications blueprint.  It’s not about the hammer, it is about the house.

Normally, this is the prevue of the CIO, and this is what they get paid to do.  However, the majority of the time the CIO is more the CSO (Chief Systems Officer) than they are the Chief Information Officer.  They normally focus on the systems that information is stored on, and how it gets there and how it gets retrieved.  In most cases, however, that data is only valuable if used by the right people and communicated to the correct teams.  Normal processes stop short building in the communications aspect of data delivery.  So let’s change the way we think about this process all together.

What we need is a Collaboration strategy.  In a similar way that every business is now building BCPs (Business Continuity Plans) and DRPs (Disaster Recovery Plans) I believe they should be building Collaboration Plans.  The Collaboration Plan should tie into every system, should identify process enhancement, business survivability, and data redundancy.  The two things that most companies cannot survive without are voice communications and email.  If done correctly these are key components of a Collaboration Strategy.  To build a Collaboration strategy we need to follow a few simple rules.

Rule #1:  Spend time with every business unit and department in your organization, and find out how they communicate.  I did this in one of my customers who recently spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on new state of the art IP Handsets.  After I spent some time reviewing their existing processes I realized the 47% of their staff never touched a handset.  Of that 47%half of them were sales people who lived on their mobile phones.  The other half communicated on a variety of non-sanctioned instant messaging clients. So why did they buy all of those phones? They were replacements for the previous system.  No one took the time to build a plan, they just replaced the tool…

Rule #2:  Determine what tools you have already purchased, THROUGHOUT the organization.  In one of my federal clients we found over 150 different management tools with each having a 70% overlap in some fashion with at least 10 other products.  There was not consolidated review before tools were purchased and with each change in personnel there was a change in preference with no guiding strategic document to control the tactical purchases.

Rule #3:  Identify what additional technology you need to reduce the mean “time to decision” in each process identified in Rule #1 without changing the process and disrupting the end user culture.  Take into account the findings in Rule #2 and identify what can be re-used and what needs to be scrapped.

Rule #4: Build a plan that spans 18-36 months with pre-planned technical reviews every 6-12-18 month markers.  The largest cost to most Voice over IP phone systems today is the handsets.  Two years ago vendors released tools like Mobile Communicators which ran on Mobile smartphones that supported 802.11 Wireless. You could actually have your office phone on your cell phone, which would alleviate the need for companies where 47% of the people only use their smartphones anyway.  The problem was that two years ago few mobile phones had 802.11 built in, and the applications drained the batteries so fast the application was not practical.  However, 24 months later…we have the iPhone,the Android, and dozens of phones that can connect to wireless networks and the batteries have been optimized for application use.  We can build better plans for growth and save our customers much needed money.

Using these four rules, I have a 3 step process.  First conduct a business review, Rule#1.  Second, conduct a technical review,Rules 2 and 3.  Finally, build your plan Rule #4.  Of course, the devil is always in the details, and I know this is a very generic overview.  I hope it will help you find a starting point and to understand that while sometimes the planning phase may seem like it will cost more than it is worth, it can provide you with long term savings.  It can increase your productivity and it can increase your profits. 

I recommend that you engage a paid consultant either from your integrator or use a third party.  As a part of the integrator community, I can say with certainty that you will get what you pay for.  If someone offers you free consulting to get your business, what you will get in return is a report from an automated tool that will attempt to justify your purchase of some individual tool or system.  If you pay them to spend time with your people and ask them to be your honest broker then you will normally get the best person they have, because this is where their reputation is made or broken.  Not in the free pre-sales effort.

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

Collaboration Mistakes | Social Collaboration

"Twitter Lists": Managing Information Flow

by Dan Stephens 11/13/2009 6:37:00 PM

Information overload causes even the best leaders to quickly become overwhelmed with today’s plethora of information resources.  Social Networking is the new buzz for enterprise networking because it has inadvertently created a way to consolidate those various sources of information into useful communities. Controlling the flow of the information torrent coming at Enterprises is such a critical marketspace that Cisco, Google, Microsoft, and IBM are spending millions to exploit it. 

Let me share with you a standard set of tools currently being used for corporate messaging (read marketing) and how you can configure them to channel the information you consume into a set of relevant views for yourself and others.

Let’s start with the basics: corporate web sites, blogs, twitter, facebook, and linked-in. These are the common tools of the web marketing trade.

Companies have spent millions of dollars building web sites that portray a corporate image for the masses.  Spending millions in advertising, press releases and product announcements to drive people to those sites, web sites still tend to be static, like electronic catalogues and store fronts.  Web sites are the destination that you, as a consumer, are being driven to.

Blogs, anyone who watches television has heard the term blog, but most consumers still do not know what it is or if they do, they are not comfortable with the concept of sharing their private lives publicly.  Blogs are electronic diaries that popped up when technical exhibitionists found a way to share their lives with the world.  The corporate world latched on to the concept of sharing information more dynamically without having to re-develop their expensive web sites. Businesses started to use them to have dynamic conversations with their consumers, market analysts and the public at large.  The comments shared with the company could then be published with the original content and create a conversation.  However, the consumer either had to be driven to the corporate blog or had to search it out.

Micro-blogs, like twitter, take the concept of a blog to a whole new level.  They are a public record of thoughts expressed in only 140 characters or less.  Millions of people now had a voice to participate dynamically in individual thoughts shared by everyone, celebrities, politicians, CEOs, musicians, and common everyday people.  Communities formed to have electronic conversations.  Simply by searching key words you could find people, companies, anyone who had posted a thought.  Then you could follow them, keeping track of the conversations or the individuals.

Facebook and Linked-in gave protected forums to people to connect and share with people they already knew or had professional relationships with.  They combined blogging with micro-blogging, organized communities with ad-hoc communities,and social applications that could be used by all.

The population of these social communities is in the range of 100’s of millions of participants. That means the conversation threads are in the billions if not trillions.  That information can be harnessed and provide you with a competitive informational advantage in understanding market trends, reaching consumers and building a corporate image.

I will not go into the entire eco-system in this article but let present this example to tie the components together.

                  My small consulting company has a web site and a blog. (I did not spend millions on either).  I have facebook and linked-in accounts for myself where I am a member of several communities.  I also have a twitter account for myself @stephensdd and for the company @collaborate_kde.  My goal is to drive people to web site where the will learn that we do VoIP training, technical and business consulting. In order to provide value I post articles to the blog and to e-zines.  Up to this point I’ve relied on search engine optimization to get “found”.  Recently I began to use twitterfeed.com to automatically post to the company twitter account every time I create a blog entry.  Each post makes me a part of the searchable conversation, and I draw in followers who then monitor my tweets,then blogs, then the web site. 

            This is not news for those already familiar with twitter, but twitter added something this week that is extremely useful.  Twitter lists. Until this week if I wanted to follow IT analysts for industry trending I had to follow each one individually combing work and personal tweets on the same page causing that dreaded information overload and providing little value.  Now I can create a Twitter list and call it any thing I want, like collaborate_kde/Collaboration_Experts.  I can then add, @CiscoCollab,@Tandberg, @MicrosoftSharepoint (these are made up) and@UCStrategies to alist.  When I want to follow theconversation for that list I simply click on it and I can see the industry conversation trending, product announcements, legal announcements and the like in one view.  That view is separate from my personal tweets and from other industries I may be tracking.

            Two final thoughts on Twitter lists, first they are public and anyone who finds your list on a key word search can follow your list and second you can follow your own company account in the same list.  If I desire to elevate my corporate image to my consumers to demonstrate my industry expertise, than what better way to have my tweets in the same list as the tweets from the giants in my industry.  Since I own the list I am the only one who can modify which accounts it will follow.

            I can now have my other social sites like facebook and linked-in follow my tweets and automatically re-post the same information with one simple entry into the blog. 

Now my 300 + Facebook friends and my 400 plus contacts on linked-in will be notified that I am actively writing articles like this to help you all achieve success in communication!  Good luck and happy tweeting, as always feel free to chime in and make this blog more dynamic.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Social Collaboration

Politically Incorrect Management Tips... Number 4

by Dan Stephens 11/10/2009 11:41:00 PM

Dedicated to learning better management techniques, I am an avid reader of everything management related.  My personal favorites are the “21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”, by John Maxwell and from “Good to Great” by Jim Collins.  Together I believe those two books will guide people with the aptitude for leadership to excel in management.  

They are an excellent tutorial on management leadership they are also very “politically correct”.  I am not “politically correct” and believe I have found a few pearls of wisdom that the inner leader in all of us might find enlightening. 

  • Learn that “Collaboration” is a process and NOT a set of tools.

The last piece of politically incorrect advice I can give all managers in this day of social networking is to understand that “Collaboration” is a process and it is not a set of magic tools. Collaboration is what you do in the execution of your unique business processes that make you and your team successful. 

The hype about the tools from Cisco, Microsoft or Google may convince you that you cannot live without some widget in order to collaborate, but collaboration is broader than any one tool or set of tools.  I challenge you to think of Collaboration in the following terms; process, culture and technology. 

Build a communications strategy that will introduce technology into your existing business processes that do not disrupt your culture, but result in improving your process response times.  If you follow this process it  will cause the culture to automagically shift and the technology adoption will help to accelerate the success wheel.

Why is this a politically incorrect tip?  I manage a Collaboration Practice for a UC partner that makes its money selling widgets that you must have.  Therefore it is very politically incorrect for me to tell you that you want to evaluate the widgets for the proper fit into your processes before you buy it.  Good Luck in your management endeavors.

 

 

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

Politically incorrect management tips...

Politically Incorrect Management Tips...Number 3

by Dan Stephens 11/10/2009 11:15:00 PM

Dedicated to learning better management techniques, I am an avid reader of everything management related.  My personal favorites are the “21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”, by John Maxwell and from “Good to Great” by Jim Collins.  Together I believe those two books will guide people with the aptitude for leadership to excel in management.  

They are an excellent tutorial on management leadership they are also very “politically correct”.  I am not “politically correct” and believe I have found a few pearls of wisdom that the inner leader in all of us might find enlightening. 

  • Managing horizontally is NOT bypassing channels 
Managing horizontally, is management without authority and if doneincorrectly will cause you more problems than you solve.  If done properly then you will have assisted your fellow management team without challenging their authority. 
To manage horizontally you must understand the proper motivation. My motivation is basic math, profitability.  I am very process oriented because process creates repeatability;repeatability reduces deviation and increases productivity.  Documentation of the process allows a senior skill set to manage multiple junior skill sets without as great a need for independent thought, thereby lowering labor costs. 
This works wonderfully, until the teams managed by your peers are NOT process oriented.  When you run into this wall, you need to knock it down, go over it or go around it.  The first two options are general bad because knocking it down requires that you confront your fellow manager’s lack of process and going over it means that you report your peer to your management. I always recommend “attempting” to work it out with your peer if you can but if you can’t then going around the wall is the path of least resistance. 
This politically incorrect move must be executed very cautiously. I have used it on multiple occasions in various ways.  One example would be when I needed to re-enforce policies within my own team by using the resources of a separate and independentteam. 
My team provided professional services engineering and my engineers needed to learn and implement the new process.  However, with over 20 engineers I could not participate in each project, but each project had a project manager.  I went to PMO group manager first and explained what I needed but I found that he was not as effective as I needed.  
The project management group only totaled around 6 people and they all sat in the same area.  The individual project managers were eager to control the projects better and more profitably.  I was the source for all engineering resources.  So I made apoint to visit their cubicle area at least once a week and ask what I could do to help them manage the projects.
I provided the documentation that my engineers were supposed to be completing for customer sign-off.  I explained to the engineers what I wanted and then I had the project managers request the exact documentation I provided to them.  I provided their team with the initial documentation and processes. The Project Managers siezed the success and maintained the documentation.  This technique lead to the adoption of my process by both groups.
Horizontal management when exercised with the right intentions will help you to build inter-departmental relationships that are required for businesses to thrive in today’s marketplace.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

Politically incorrect management tips...

Politically Incorrect Management Tips...Number 2

by Dan Stephens 11/10/2009 11:03:00 PM

Dedicated to learning better management techniques, I am an avid reader of everything management related.  My personal favorites are the “21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”, by John Maxwell and from “Good to Great” by Jim Collins.  Together I believe those two books will guide people with the aptitude for leadership to excel in management.  

They are an excellent tutorial on management leadership they are also very “politically correct”.  I am not “politically correct” and believe I have found a few pearls of wisdom that the inner leader in all of us might find enlightening. 

 

  •  Manage the skill set and deal with the personality

 

The second bit of politically incorrect advice I can offeris to, “Manage the skill set and deal with the personality”.  In my 20 years of management I have hadtwo individuals whom have cemented this principle into my grouping ofmanagement facts.  Both of theseemployees were the absolute best in their respective fields, from a skill setperspective. 

The danger enterswhen those people realize they are the best.  That is the point in time, when you as a manager understandwhat they are like when they are no longer afraid of being able to find ajob.  Some are demanding, some areloud, some are inconsiderate and some are all of the above.  Don’t get me wrong, I don’t care howgood you are in your field there are still lines of conduct that cannot becrossed.  

If you determinethe skill set is valuable enough to go through the effort then I recommend thatyou learn to manage the skill set and deal with the personality.  Let me offer this in way of an example…

            Let’s take a senior Technology Architect whose job is to manage teamsof deployment engineers for multiple projects.  A corporate team comprised of an Account Manager, ProjectManager, Pre-Sales Engineer and Logistics team supports our TA.  The skill set possessed by our TA isphenomenal, he is more knowledgeable than the vendor’s own engineering team, hecan manage multiple teams of engineers and provide accurate, professionaldocumentation on every engagement on time and under budget.  The personality of our engineer isloud, foul mouthed, demanding, quick tempered, prideful, and stubborn. 

 

My tactic is simple; manageeveryone else away from the negative aspects of his personality.  I provide him a sounding board anytimehe needs it.  I push myself to beas good as he is from a conceptual level and to always understand something hedoes not. 

I place his skill set ona team of people whom I have managed into an effective unit to deal with eachother’s personalities to take advantage of their skill sets.  On internal conference calls I onlyhave a few rules, no personal attacks, respect one another and require everyoneto express their thoughts openly. By encouraging openness internally, it limits customer-facing issues andallows me to enforce strict professionalism code at all customer-facing times.

Remember this rule and you might avoid some of my early issues of trying to change the person, instead of just educating the skill set and dealing with the person. 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Politically Incorrect Management Tips...Number 1

by Dan Stephens 11/10/2009 1:51:00 AM

Dedicated to learning better management techniques, I am an avid reader of everything management related.  My personal favorites are the “21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”, by John Maxwell and from “Good to Great” by Jim Collins.  Together I believe those two books will guide people with the aptitude for leadership to excel in management.  

They are an excellent tutorial on management leadership they are also very “politically correct”.  I am not “politically correct” and believe I have found a few pearls of wisdom that the inner leader in all of us might find enlightening. 

  • People will do what it is in their nature to do 

This first pearl of wisdom came from my grandfather, who was a farmer in southern Illinois.  My grandfather and I would plow the garden by hand with an old mule named Jack.  Jack would frequently sit down (yes sit down) half way between the barn and the garden.  That mule knew when he was being put to work and wanted nothing to do with it. 

Gramps would try for a few minutes at pulling and cajoling but invariably he would always end up tying a carrot to the end of a stick and lead Jack on.  Jack would follow that carrot anywhere, and it frustrated me (I was 10).  I asked Grandpa why he didn’t get angry and his reply was simple and timeless.  Jack’s nature is to be stubborn, and animals are predictable. 

Over the years I have interpreted this analogy several different ways but when applied through the lens, provided by Jim Collins in“Good to Great”, of getting the right people on the bus and then getting them in the right seats or off the bus all together I finally found a principle that I live by.  People will do what it is in their nature to do.  Human nature is not universal, however with time it IS predictable.  Let me offer an anecdotal case for your consideration.

            Robert was a junior engineer on my staff.  I worked with Robert on his career development plan. We worked to define goals.  He was provided on the job training, training materials and compensation incentives.  Yet after one attempt at professional certification and one failure, he chose not to try again.  He knew his job required this certification. 

The company would cover up to four failed attempts, so he had nothing to lose.  After a year and half, still no attempts and no progress.  I had a decision to make move him to another seat or move him off.  Robert is an outstanding employee but I found out two things about his nature.

First he could not focus on too many things at once and second he hated the thought of failure. Our business was service based and required an individual to work on multiple projects while studying for certifications, so focus was my first issue.  I needed to provide him stability to study and second I needed to provide him with a greater incentive than his fear of failure.  So my goal was to keep him on the bus but to move him to another seat, one that was stable but not comfortable so that he would want to risk failure to achieve his goals to be moved.  He was moved into our logistics department as the engineering liaison.

 A stable position but absolutely no fun for an engineer, this should get him to fight his nature I thought.  I was WRONG. 

No matter how stable it was, or how much time he had to study, his fear of failure kept him in that position from that point forward.  I employed Maxwell’s “Laws of Leadership” and Collin’s theory of finding the right seat on the bus, but in the end I developed my own Principle “People will do what is in their nature to do”, regardless of all the management techniques deployed.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Politically incorrect management tips...

Got VoIP? Where’s your video?

by Dan Stephens 6/13/2009 10:28:00 PM

In my top 5 list of missing investments, once companies deploy VoIP, is basic video conference integration.  In order to do Voice over IP well, we have to implement Quality of Service on our network.  Yes even on the Local Area Network not just the WAN.  QoS will even out the traffic spikes that can interrupt both voice and video.  If the network is already prepared to handle voice then it should only require some minor tweaking to also handle video.  The question then becomes, why not do video? 

The reasons for not doing video vary from cost and maintenance to just a lack of perceived value.  Mature end users are not used to or comfortable with the always on concept introduced with video.  Most vendors try to sell companies video by discussing return on investment.  They discuss hard costs and they discuss soft costs and those variables are important, but do they cause people to buy?  No, people buy video when they “see” the benefit.  How can we help them see the benefits?

The first step is to understand video conferencing.  There are two major implementations of video conferencing.  First is video conferencing via ISDN (integrated services digital network) from the telephone company.  ISDN lines to each video unit (called a codec) can be extremely costly.   Second is video conferencing via IP (internet protocol) either by using h.323 or SIP (session initiation protocol).  IP based conferencing is much more cost effective when deployed on a high speed network like a LAN or well designed WAN. Those are the basics, now lets add a few more elements.  Video conferencing can be point to point (codec to codec) or Multipoint (multiple codecs to a video bridge also called a Multipoint Control Unit).  We can combine the best of IP and ISDN by centralizing ISDN trunks at the edge of the network and then use IP conferencing internally to the network by using an IP to ISDN gateway.  An h.323 gatekeeper/SIP registrar is very much like a DNS server in that it maps names to IP address to make calling from one codec to another much simpler for end users.  While by no means complete, this paragraph should give the reader a basic understanding of video conferencing components. 

When VoIP was deployed, the network infrastructure was most likely revamped to accommodate the voice traffic by adding a separate VLAN to isolate the voice traffic.  PoE switches were added, a phone was placed on each persons desk and maybe software on each users machine to act as a soft phone.  Many people have some form of instant messaging, at home at least.  IM is overcoming security and legal issues and is moving into the workspace.  We have prepared the end users for communication and are on the very short path to collaboration.  The network is 98% of the way to supporting video, a few changes to the QoS policies locally and with the WAN provider and bingo, video ready network infrastructure. 

Now, where are the benefits?  They are different for each company and can revolve around feeling a need, satisfying the fear that they are not being left behind the competition, vendors and partners.  Executive decrees to meet green initiatives, provide face to face meetings with their peers.  My goals in collaboration are very simple, presence, voice and video.  If I can enable a corporation’s existing business processes with presence, voice and video, then I have helped them take the technological step to collaboration.  Collaboration is really a combination of three things Technology, Culture and Process.  Changing technology and process are simple, but culture is what will make or break any technology and / or process change.  My objective is to insert the new technology into the existing culture and process to limit change and increase adoption.  I know what you are thinking, “but what are the benefits?” Ok, let’s get to those. 

Benefits of video (collaboration) enabling your business processes are:

  • Increased efficiency, which leads to…
  • Increased productivity, which encourages…
  • Reduced overhead, which allows for…
  • Fewer employee related expenses, and causes
  • Increased profits.

 By presence enabling your existing process you reduce the time to action, by identifying which team members are available immediately and how you can reach them.  By reaching the team members by IM, Voice or Video, decisions can be made on what discussions need to be reviewed as a group and which does not.  Documents can be shared and reviewed in minutes instead of waiting until the conference room is available.  By video enabling these meetings you can see the team’s body language, which of them is comfortable in the decisions, being made and who is not.  When team members see each other they are culturally more respectful of each others opinions and time.  When you bring remote team members together you can hire the best and brightest people for the position regardless of where they are located in the country or the world for that matter.  Utilizing document sharing and video conferencing and content sharing fewer employee related expenses are incurred.  I will caveat that statement with the fact that infrastructure requirements will increase but technology costs tend to reduce year after year as the given technology, in this case bandwidth becomes a commodity, while employee costs seem to continually rise year after year.  These benefits combined will lead to a higher bottom line and hopefully drive a more robust top line as well. 

There are of course a million other reasons and a million other benefits because there are at least a million different situations, but video enabling collaboration on a VoIP network will pay off.  It will pay off, if your company actually has processes and actually takes the time to improve and follow them.  Technology will enhance the Process, but if the Culture is not in place then, Collaboration can not be successful.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Collaboration Mistakes

Got VoIP? Did you integrate your applications?

by Dan Stephens 1/29/2009 11:42:00 PM

The second most common error, in my list, when deploying voice over IP (VoIP) is ignoring business process improvement.   My original supposition was that customers were foregoing the integration conversation because of the huge capital expenditure on the new phone system, I was wrong.  I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to my readers and my clients; you were not ignoring this opportunity to improve your business communications.  You were not choosing not to spend the time and money to increase departmental productivity and boost overall profitability.  Nope, I have realized in the recently that your integrators and vendors simply have not been capable of explaining to you the process concerning “how” your new VoIP system can improve your business processes.  I realized this when bringing up the concept of business process improvement to those vendors and integrators and getting a blank look from them.  The most repeated comment I hear is, “who are we to tell a customer that we understand their business, let alone that we can improve their process, we aren’t a business consulting firm, you know….”  No, you are not, is my only reply.  To my clients and readers I apologize for the industry’s lack of comprehension, and hopefully some of them will read this article. 

Collaboration is the new buzz word.  What collaboration should mean to you is pretty straight forward and I am saddened by the lack of awareness in my own industry of its definition.  Collaboration is the integration of enhanced communications into your daily business practices.  If that is the definition then to understand the definition we need to only clarify two concepts and then everyone should be able to implement collaboration.  First, what do I mean by enhanced communications?  Second, what are your daily business practices?  Let’s look at each of these questions. 

How do you communicate today?  Here is the list of normal communications within and between companies.  Email (no surprise it’s first in the list), phone, corporate voicemail, mobile phone, mobile voicemail, IM (AOL, MSN and possibly Corporate IM), Conference room video, person to person video, facebook and myspace.  When we work in work groups we may share data files, such as presentations, spreadsheets and the like on a shared drive or maybe even a web based workgroup portal like Microsoft Sharepoint.  But let’s face facts the way you really communicate that data is in an email.  So does this sound familiar?   

What is enhanced communications?  Enhanced communications is the ability to evaluate the preceding paragraph and actually tie them together seamlessly.  Your business has already invested in a voice over IP system, which means they have upgraded the network and designed it to carry voice without degradation, right?  Guess what, that means you can most likely do video as well.  Most of the competent VoIP systems have plug-ins to your email client so that you can select a user and choose click-to-dial while preparing an email.  Corporate instant messaging clients like Cisco’s WebEx Connect, Microsoft’s Office Communicator and Lotus Sametime all support sharing presence information, and controlling either a softphone (computer based IP Phone) or your actual deskphone to make calls from your VoIP system.  Most of those “presence” control panels will allow you to check someone’s presence, send them an instant message, convert that to a phone call, upgrade it to a conference call or engage multiple participants in a WebEx style conference that will allow you to converge audio at the same time as you share your desktop, share files, and engage in better communications.  How about the simple act of getting your voicemail’s delivered to your inbox so that you can listen to it on your Black Berry, or having a single number to call and have it dial both your office phone and your cell phone simultaneously.   These are not really enhanced communications, many of the VoIP systems on the market provide these as standard features.  So let’s dive deeper.  Let’s throw contact centers into the mix.  For those that are unfamiliar with this term think about what you hear when you call most banks today.  The system answers with a list of options and most of them sound life like enough to not irritate everyone.  What if you had those options in your day to day operations, would it help?  Or how about being able to dial a phone number and the system automagically calls each of your team members in an emergency situation?  What about we combine those two and have the system call your employees to check on a process, and the employee is asked to confirm a status by pressing 1 or 2 and based on the response the system calls the next person in the list until you have a resolution at which time the system generates a report and emails it to you.  You should be starting to see what you purchased when you invested in that VoIP infrastructure and system.  It really is a lot more than just some really cool phone.  If you look at the next question critically, then that phone system can turn into a profit center, a cost reducer and method for business process improvement. 

On to the second question, what are your daily business practices?  I ran into problems here.  I started my first business my freshman year of college, and it failed.  I started my second business with a friend of mine 2 years later and it had a successful 8 year run, with over 20 employees.  The differentiator was that I had learned team organization and process.  By applying good old fashioned common sense and with no formal training in management I found, what I now know to be, the most public secret I’ve ever seen.  Plainly stated as, advise your people what you want, ask them if they can think of a better method, and try it.  If your results are not optimal, get additional feed back, make modifications and try it again.  Finally, document it. That’s the short version of most of my success.  For 15 years I’ve been operating under the assumption that “it is so simple everyone must be doing it that way”.  But they don’t.  Large companies pay consultants outrageous fees to analyze existing processes for improvement instead of asking the people doing the job “how” they believe it should be enhanced.  Of late I’ve realized most corporations don’t invest in processes management, unless they are in the manufacturing sector.   I know there are ITIL initiatives, Six Sigma, and process management programs that hinder productivity and I am not promoting those programs for anyone that doesn’t envision a business case them, but for goodness sakes spend a little time with a piece of paper and write down how your business should function.  Then take a hard look at how it “does” function and I’ll bet you’ll be, at least, a little surprised.   I don’t know what your business processes are, but you should.  I can tell you they are categorized as either management, operational or supporting processes and that the internet abounds with business process information.  I can not improve your business process with collaboration.  I can help you improve your business process with communication.  As a consultant I have developed workshops to help you conduct a self analysis.  Start by defining your stakeholders in any given process.  In my case, as an integrator, it is the vendor, the account managers, the inside sales group, the project management group, the engineering team, the logistics team and the customer.  My goal is to improve the existing process as it is currently implemented by adding enhanced communications.  My intent is not to change the existing process, that is an entirely different model of consulting, and I am not an expert in your industry and I will not insult my customers by pretending to be.  Let’s review how we can improve my process and maybe that will present you with some ideas. 

Cisco is one of my chief sales partners and they bring leads to our account team.  Many of those leads, a Cisco account manager and system engineer have already been engaged in and have historical data that they could share with us as an integrator.  Cisco has a Corporate IM client and workspace tool call WebEx Connect.  WebEx Connect combines VoIP call control, audio and web conferencing, desktop sharing, instant messaging, presence sharing and project specific workspace portals that can be used to mash up data from multiple web-based or database applications, store data files and maintain discussion groups within the portal.  The benefit WebEx Connect has over free products like Google, MSN or Yahoo, is that the data is stored on the privately secured WebEx MediaTone network.  This allows my company to use the service with assurance that sensitive customer data can be maintained securely.  Cisco has inserted WebEx Connect workspaces into their process for sharing data internally, by doing so they have allowed me the use of an exciting tool for collaboration.  My company uses WebEx Connect for internal collaboration as well and because of this Cisco can invite me into the existing space that they have established for the customer lead that they would like us to run with.  That workspace could already include the customer and Cisco or just Cisco, but I know have the opportunity to work the deal with all of the information that Cisco has already collected.  My account management team and presales engineer can upload their design work, notes, and discussion points to this workspace during the presales process, so that all parties can see the data, raise discussion points and make corrections.  We have eliminated, in this process, the thousands of emails with huge attachments and the time searching through email strings to make sure that the design is correct and that nothing was missed.  We have collaborated.  When the deal is sold, I can then invite my project manager and my engineering team to this same workspace so they can see the history, review the SOW, understand the politics of the client, and upload the project notes, system design and testing documents.  The inside sales team can be invited so that they are working from the final design and can upload the actual order information for tracking.  The logistics team can review the order and the update shipping and delivery information.  The customer can be invited to ask questions of the entire team for clarification, keep track of discussion points and to make sure that all parties have the same information during the project execution.  The tool will allow you to see the workspace specific presence list of anyone who has been invited into the workspace without adding them to your buddy list.  Presence information will allow you to know if you should IM them, send them an email, Call them pc to pc, video call them pc to pc, or click to call via your VoIP solution.  Of all the tools we explored earlier in the enhanced communication toolbox I have only introduced one into this existing process.  This one tool has saved physical disk space on multiple mail servers, increased productivity by eliminating the classical email search, and has presented all parties in the process with a common easy to use portal from pre-sales to project delivery.  I can now turn the portal over to my maintenance and monitoring team, so that they will have a historical perspective of the client as well as all of the design and as-built documentation. 

Collaboration is the integration of enhanced communications into your daily business practices.  To further clarify, collaboration is the enhancement of existing processes by using an enhanced communication toolset.  Talk to your stake holders and ask them what applications they are using, CRM, ERP, and / or custom databases.  Then begin to at least have the conversation with your integrator about how they can help you enhance your daily processes with the equipment and infrastructure you have already spent so much money on.  If they are unable to help, feel free to drop me a line. 

Dan Stephens is the Unified Communications Practice Lead for Presidio Networked Solutions in the Mid-Atlantic Region.  He has over 20 years of network, systems, security and voice experience.  He holds many industry certifications including CISSP, CCVP, and the MCSE + database + messaging. He is also a CompTia CTT+ Certified technical trainer and has been certified to conduct Netware, Microsoft and Cisco courses.  He can be reached at dstephens@presidio.com or Stephens.dd@gmail.com

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Collaboration Mistakes

Got VoIP, What did you forget to add...Segment 1 FoIP

by Dan Stephens 10/9/2008 1:53:00 AM
 

Got VoIP?  What did you forget to add…

 
The Top “5” biggest mistakes after converting to VoIP, and I’ll bet your company is making them all. So what are they, you ask
  • Did you keep analog fax lines to run your fax machines?
  • Have you chosen not to integrate the phones with your everyday applications?
  • Have you failed to invest in simple point-to-point video, in this “you-tube” enabled workforce?
  • Did you combine all of the features listed above into a strategic unified collaboration vision?
  • Last but not least, did you educate your users, to increase the adoption rate, increase communications proficiency and boost productivity?

I live in the Cisco Reseller world and I see these 5 mistakes repeated in almost every-one of my clients. Most likely you just dismissed me as a sales person. I am not. I am the Unified Collaboration Practice lead and a Senior Voice Engineer. I spent over 12 years working as a Microsoft Trainer/Consultant on the entire Back-office suite of products, from SQL to SMS, Web Development, Exchange and CRM. So, why the background information, you may ask? Well I believe that we, as a business community, are so busy upgrading to the latest and greatest applications from each vendor that we do not stop to integrate the applications together to achieve the normal justification for new software in the first place, increased proficiency and productivity.  I’ve decided to do something about it. I have made it my mission to take my one little corner of the world’s technology real estate and begin to explain to the CxO’s and Budget Managers why it makes sense to slow down and build an IT infrastructure to promote productivity and proficiency in the rest of the business. I would like to help identify where those budget dollars would be better spent in the long run.  This first article will deal with the number “1” biggest mistake that I see most every adopter of VoIP make, the failure to convert their Faxing infrastructure at the same time as they convert the Voice infrastructure.  

What are some of the common reasons cited for not making the change?  

  •  We have a large investment in our legacy fax machines
  •  I’ve heard FoIP is not reliable, and Faxes get dropped 
  •  My users will revolt if I try to change the way they fax. 
  • Networks designed for VoIP can’t handle the new fax machine signaling speeds 
  • Our vendor did not recommend it. 
  • It was one more expense we couldn’t afford 

This is a short list, but it is the list I hear most often recited to me from clients and potential clients. We should start this discussion by simply stating that 2 years ago, these were valid issues, even 18 months ago these might have been valid issues, but today EVERYONE who has VoIP should be looking into converting their Faxing Infrastructure to FoIP. So what has really changed? There really hasn’t been any magic, just simple market based economics. Let’s take each reason listed above one by one, shall we. 

 First, let’s deal with the large investment in legacy fax machines. This really impacts the End User issues as well as the reliability concerns, but I’ll get to those points later. Historically, when FoIP was implemented it involved the following setup that looked something like this;

 

A Fax machine from outside of ACME Corp, would call the fax number for ACME Corp and the call would be routed to ACME Corp’s Voice Gateway from the Public Switched Telephone Network, or Ma BELL.  ACME Corps brand new VoIP phone system would then use an Analog Telephone Adapter (ATA) to convert the Digital call from Ethernet (Digital) to an RJ-11 (Standard Analog Phone Jack).   That works for both inbound and outbound faxing, some of the time.  Issues did arise with the standard protocols for handling Fax-pass through and Fax-forwarding.  T.30 is the standard for Fax to Fax communication, T.38 is the standard for Fax to Fax over IP and T.37 is the standard for sending a fax-image file via email to the intended recipient of a fax.   So where did this setup fail ACME Corp?  Well the ATA most likely did not fully support the T.38 protocol.  That issue would present itself many ways the most common of which is that most faxes would work fine, but when ACME Corps, legal firm ZED Lawyers, inc purchased a new fax machine that operated faster than 14.4 KBPS then their faxes would not get through.  Constant troubleshooting would ensue, lost revenue, communication and productivity made the solution very quickly a losing proposition.  To fix this problem Fax Vendors, who have been offering network based Fax Servers, entered the FoIP Market and learned to connect their Fax Server Software to the Voice Gateways via trunking protocols like SIP with T.38 riding on top.  So now everyone could Fax from their Desktop applications and receive their individual faxes in their email inbox.  By putting the server in the middle which fully supports T.37 and T.38 they have solved the reliability issue and the tuning issue, but they left us Presales engineer with what they call and opportunity and what I call a problem.   ELF, Existing Legacy Fax machines, legacy employees are comfortable with their fax machines, and let’s face it some documents need to be faxed, due to signatures.  The opportunity was to sell self feeding scanners or network enabled document imaging stations, instead I looked for someone who had solved the problem.   I found that several companies had done just that. Here is how it was done;

ACME Corp.s Fax Servers now support FoIP directly so they only need to tune the T.38 protocol once for the inbound and outbound connection to the Voice Gateway that is connected to the PSTN.  ACME Corp has gained the ability to have the inbound faxes delivered directly to your inbox, thereby increasing end user productivity.  Next, the vendors dealt with the ELFs by adding what I call an ELF proxy, a very simple application that sits on a client machine and fully supports T.38 and connects to the fax server.  What was the missing piece?  The missing piece was an ATA that fully supports T.38 and can be configured to point to ACME Corps ELF Proxy.  Once T.38 is tuned between the new ATA’s and the ELF Proxy, and then from the Fax Server to the Voice Gateway, our vendors have solved several of ACME Corps issues.

  •  Number 1, can ACME Corp continue to use its Existing Legacy Fax machines?
    • Yes
  • Number 2, have we fixed the reliability issues regarding the T.30, T.38, and T.37 Tuning and speed deltas?
    • Yes, we now can reliably send and receive faxes 99% of the time
  • Number 3, can users continue to do business as normal?
    • Yes, ACME should begin the process of updating equipment that is network based and natively supports FoIP for Document management if Faxing continues to be a critical business infrastructure driver but we have bought them time to do it at their pace and still enjoy the benefits of fax convergence
  • Number 4, can a Network designed for VoIP handle fax sensitive protocols?
    • Yes, Experience pays off during the design process, the right partner will make your FoIP implementation a success
  • .Number 5, our vendor did not recommend it…
    • I hope you can understand why they might have shied away from it, most partners are implementers and not integrators so margin is made by how quickly they can turn and burn a project.  Finding the right partner is the key.
  • Number 6, it was one more expense we couldn’t add to the project…
    • To address this line you have to begin to consider the ROI
      • The actual cost of a Fax Server is the cost of the Software, the hardware and the labor to implement it.
        •  The Software and maintenance will range between $3,000 and $9,000
        • The Server Hardware will range between $2,500 and $12,000 (your choice on that one…Oh yeah it can be virtualized as well, VMWare anyone?)
        • Implementation costs will vary depending on size of the implementation, number of locations and regions.  However the actual server install and the base configuration will normally take between 2 days to a week.
      • You stop paying for the separate Analog lines being retained specifically for the Fax Machines.
      • You stop having to manage the separate bills at the end of the month
      • You log each inbound and outbound fax at the fax server for centralized management and billing§  Archive all sent faxes for legal record keeping in digital format
      • Receive Email notification as a receipt for sent faxes
      • Begin the increase in productivity by training the users to receive their faxes in their inbox so that they can read them without disrupting their thought process to check for incoming faxes.
      • Faxes received in email can be read from any location where they can get their mail, making the weekend trip into the office to retrieve a fax no longer a requirement.

If you have invested in a VoIP Enterprise solution and you have not yet centralized on an Enterprise FoIP solution, don’t wait any longer.  The technology is there and it is sound.  For the sake of brevity I did not even discuss the advantages for large corporations to send Faxes, Fax server to Fax Server via the WAN utilizing HTTP encrypted using SSL.  My call to action for you is to get your VoIP partner on the phone and ask them to help you get FoIP in your environment today.

Please join my rant next week as I rant about the lack of Collaboration deployment with the existing applications already in your workplace.

 Daniel Stephens is a Senior Voice Engineer and the Unified Collaboration Practice lead for Presidio Network Solutions, Mid-Atlantic Region.  He has had over 20 years of Executive level experience in Technology and Business management.  If you have questions or comments he can be reached at dstephens@presidio.com.

 

Currently rated 4.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

Collaboration Mistakes

Powered by KDE HELP! using BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0

About KDE Consulting, Inc



OneGoal
Founded in 2006, KDE Consulting represents the culmination of a group of industry recognized leaders in Business Management, IT, Networking and Training. The Founders began this process together some 20 years ago, and after having built highly successful independent careers, have combined their synergy to provide you with unparalleled products and services.


E-mail me Send mail

Calendar

<<  August 2010  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

View posts in large calendar

Pages

    Recent comments

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    © Copyright 2010

    Sign in